Next Generation SEO Guide. 100% Free. 200% Effective

Friday, 27 February 2009

WIN 2 Skiing Holidays with Prezzybox

I've just entered to win a skiing holiday with PrezzyBox which you can find out about here.

So why have I entered? Well Prezzybox have great products that will fit well with the site's I'm already running, but I'm also spending a fair whack on one site this year doing it up and marketing it which also focuses on some of the products that PrezzyBox offer and doing a low-key launch of a new site that will do product reviews on one section of their products that I know do well.

Another reason is that my mate Stevo has been trying to get me to learn to Ski for months and I know I'll be crap (nearly as bad as my driving) so I'm sure it'll be a laugh!!

TwitThis

Bookmark and Share

Monday, 23 February 2009

Can You Use Twitter For SEO?

Well, it looks like Yahoo! is indexing a good few thousand pages. Then looking at the pages they've actually got Google Page Rank, but the secondary pages aren't cached.

Google itself says that they've got about 108 www.Twitter.com pages indexed buy most are the status links - make sure you link to your twitter.com profile (with no www.)

Just a very quick (2 mins) analysis says that if you can get people to link to your twitter account there is some benefit in terms of the Page Rank passed to the site in the profile. But if you're trying to get PR to the sites you mention in your Tweets then I wouldn't bother. The flow of tweets will be too great and move them off your Twitter homepage. If the flow is too low which enables them to remain on your twitter homepage then why would people want to link to you?

So check out your Twitter Bio's and check to see if you're using them to their full potential.

TwitThis

Bookmark and Share

Thanks Ethical Superstore & Summit Media For The Divine Extravagance Kit


Just a quick one to say thanks to Ethical Superstore & Atti (and team) from Summit Media for the Divine Extravagance Kit I received this morning for winning the competition they ran this month.

It's good timing, not only am I carrying on with my Easter chocolate blog, but I'm extending out of that uber-niche into the more general chocolate reviews blog - which I'll be launching later in the year. I'll be doing the reviews now and posting them when the site has been finished.

It's nice having communication in the way that Atti and I "chat", nice and light-hearted, none of the serious, direct and boring stuff that you often get. Nice stuff Atti.

I've got a load of chocolate coming, not only have I got some more Hotel Chocolat arriving this week, but also some from Thornton's (thanks Claire) but in a couple of weeks I've got a load coming from Chocolate Trading Co. - I'm just glad I've started getting loads of exercise lately!!

I'm going to have to start a "What am I eating now" ending to my blog posts ... so ...

What am I eating now? Divine 70% Dark Chocolate mini bar

TwitThis

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, 19 February 2009

Official - Microsoft IS The Source Of All Evil!

Well, sort of!

Just looking at the SiteDosier listing for other domains listed on the same IP as Microsoft.com I found thesource.ofallevil.com ;-) Well whoever does own that domain has protected their details - spoilt all my fun!

But looking at Google's IP's there's some interesting stuff too. Never heard of fusion.google.com. Is tbn8-beta.google.com anything to do with the Toolbar? Then there's www.foofle.com , www.gewgle.com and www.thetreeoflife.us/ which redirects.

I could waste sooo much time looking at related domains. Especially seeing what my competitors are up to!

TwitThis

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

Google Website Trends - An Alternative to Alexa & Compete.com?

Surely not an alternative to my beloved Hitwise but you can track the rough traffic levels to particular websites with Google Website Trends.



Just looking at MyVoucherCodes.co.uk you can see where they get most of their traffic from, or related sites and other websites people those people have also visited.

It looks like Google has been recording this data for a fair while (at least May 2007) but its the "also visited" bit that gets me. It can be from those occassional tracking redirects in the SERPS, but more probably from the Google Toolbar - any way, its good to have a bit more an insight into how your competitors get their traffic.

It's this listing that made me take notice, however:


Quidco UK Voucher Codes Quidco Discount Codes Quidco Discount ...

Quidco UK find promotional codes, money off coupon codes for great discounts at quidco.com. Find and share the best up to date Quidco UK voucher codes, ...
www.myvouchercodes.co.uk/discounts/quidco.com - 56k - Cached - Similar pages

Come on Mark! It redirects to some Adsense and then back to your homepage. I vaguely remember something on the forum about this thing you're doing. It's not big and its not clever!

Well maybe it is. He's getting more traffic than Dixons now!

But it's nice to be associated with sites also visited when people visit Affiliate Future, Paid On Results and Buy.at - does this mean I can start charging for advertising ;-)

Anyhow, go play if I were you.

TwitThis

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, 12 February 2009

You Want To Buy But Google Doesn't Want You To!

Some things I can understand Google messing around with. But when I add the keyword "buy" into a search term that means I want to buy something. However, Google doesn't seem to think its appropriate.

Doing some checking up on some rankings I find this bit at the bottom of the SERP from one of those keyphrases:


Click on that link just adds the "+" operator before the word buy (obviously ensuring that the word "buy" is included.

But this is crap, but obviously I don't have the terrabytes of data that Google have. One of the tactics I use for retail clients is to ensure the word "buy" is included on product pages to attract those in a buying frame of mind.

Looking at one of my retail clients there's a distinct reason for adding it in and the data supports my views (obviously I wouldn't be doing it otherwise).

On average the site converts at 2.49% for the past month for all search engine visits. If the word "cheap" is used, it converts at 3.57%. If the word "cheapest" is included then it converts at 5.60% and if it includes "buy" its at 4.55%. So if you're clever and include the top converting keywords then you're getting more "bang for your SEO buck".

So why would Google want to get rid of "buyers" out of the SERPS? If we want to buy then show us those pages with "buy" in first.

Mad, annoyed, angry - yep all three!

TwitThis

Bookmark and Share

Google Hit By Page Rank Penalty For Pay Per Post / Buying Links

Before anyone get's the hump, this isn't a personal attack. I've mentioned in the past about why I thought Pay per post and buying links was just plain stupid (ok, if done way too much), and now it's got cast iron, gilt edge proof.

I meant to mention that Google.jp was doing pay per post to promote its site yesterdat (thanks to Shri)allow I did Tweet it as I've been manic with client stuff. I was going to mention its "do as I say not do as I do".

But now its official and Blogstorm has picked this up. The big boys at the Googleplex have penalised (it appears) Google.jp for buying links. Their Page Rank has fallen from 9 to 5.

Even Matt Cutts has said that he expects the penalty to last for a while. At the bottom of the the Blog Storm post it says that he expects Google.jp not to loose much traffic from it. That's because most of the pages indexed are coop, support, reviews or group pages.

So my message to those who are considering buying links is to really think about your objectives and measure the risk.

I've recently been working with a price comparison site and ratcheting down the overt-SEO in favour of a long-term user-focused strategy. There will be a slight dip in traffic (revenues per visitor are actually up 25%, and more than outweighs the reduction in PV's, due to better quality content - all in two weeks), but just as with doing everything else PROPERLY, the long term gains is what you're after. So don't be greedy, don't think short-term, focus on the medium, long-term objectives and don't be swayed by so-called gurus!

TwitThis

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

My Take On The Affiliate Census 2009

Well the Affiliate Window sponsored UK Affiliate Census 2009 has been released thanks to Econsultancy

It's 63 pages long, and thankfully I got an advanced review.

Some of the headlines are great. 55% of the >1000 affiliates responded agree with me that the current financial situation is an opportunity, whilst 30% view it as a threat. I don't doubt it is a threat for certain affiliate business models or affiliates that operate in highly-vulnerable markets.

The things that annoy most affiliates, according to this survey is the entry of Google in to the affiliate marketing industry, the rise of "super-affiliates" and the increased success of voucher code sites. Personally I have no negative thoughts of Google being a network. I think I'm signed up to one of their programmes, but it hasn't affected me one-jot. I'm sure affiliates have a natural tendency to thinking about Google as a threat given their changes on PPC policy, their impact on some affiliate's rankings and the such like. But they seem to forget what Google has done for us!

Looking at the "rise of super-affiliates" I think that's also a bit of a grey area. Many super affiliates you'll never hear from, they're not interested in polishing their egos with a blog or shout about stuff on the forum. In many cases I view the negativity towards "super affiliates" as one of jealousy - strike me down I know! There are instances where "super affiliates" may be seen to abuse their power in a Microsoft kind of way insisting that they get better deals than the rest - but wouldn't you in their position?

What I found interesting was that 2% of people thought that anyone earning less than £50 was a super affiliate, whilst 17% thought it was over £50k a month.

And the rise voucher code sites, many get the wrong idea what my views are. They seem to think I am carte-blanch against voucher code sites. But if you take this particular example, you can see why I have my grievances. Not only that, but I get data from merchant analytics that often proves that the benefits of code sites aren't as fantastically profitable to them as some are keen to show. At least we've have some good progress from the IAB recently with the help of the networks.

And on to another topic that has got a load of attention. It appears from the survey that "true content" is the most important method for generating affiliate sales at 36%. I'd be interested in seeing how many actually create truly unique and useful content. The second most important method for affiliates is PPC at 20%, whilst voucher codes and cash-back sites are the top generating category for 10% of publishers. This works out to over 100 sites in these two spaces - one heck of a load!

And from a merchant's point of view ... They value SEO /content affiliates as the most valuable - that's above PPC, price comparison (blogs even), voucher codes and cash-back sites - interesting!

But how the world changes. I remember when everyone was big on price comparison sites. But they're still the third most important category at 11%. What startled me was that Blogs and forums only accounted for 8% which is significantly less than the 36% for "true content". It's also nice to see "shopping directories" hanging on with 3% - these are a blast from the past for me, but they still out do the social networking sites - until they build in SEO into them more effectively I doubt this figure will increase substantially next year.

What affiliates think of the networks is key, and mirrors my own feelings. I feel that networks should be a bit more "severe" on affiliates that break the rules. Even though I hear things, I'm sure we don't get to find out about everything that goes on.

One thing that did strike me was that 70% of affiliates believe they only have limited communication from merchants. I feel that these people must be doing something wrong. In a recent post I stated how affiliates can make their own life easier by employing a few tactics, and I feel the onus is on us now-a-days to get and organise the information that is made available to us. I was thinking about the massive levels of communication about Christmas and Valentines and am starting to see a whole load about Easter already. I even had Hotel Chocolat email me late last night about products to review for one of my sites. I feel these 70% of affiliates should be thinking about what they can do to improve the communication. There are some merchants that just don't communicate, but its their choice, they can enhance their campaign or not.

A nice side note was that affiliates are getting older as group. The under 30's now account for 26% of the sample instead of 31% two years ago which is surprising considering that 40% of the respondents have joined the industry in the past two years.

If you look at the proportion of affiliates that are engaged in the industry as hobbyists (20%) and then compare that to the fact that the survey shows that 40% of affiliates are generating less than £100 a month then that's a bit worrying. Some people are doing it part time or full time and not making "a lot".

And apparently 13% of the respondents (>130) affiliates are making over £50k a month - reet! This figure is statistically doubtful (or doubtbull) given the trend of the other revenue brackets).


Another bit of information is that full timers are more likely to use text links and PPC to market the merchants whilst part-timers and hobbyists are more likely to use banners. If they tried to incorporate text-links and content then perhaps they could become full-timers?

A worrying factor is that affiliates are more concerned with the "breadth" of the merchant base for a network OVER tracking reliability. You may have loads of nice merchants to promote, but you're less likely to be concerned if you earn from them - interesting.

Something else I just didn't get was that the most important reason for not promoting a merchant was the "quality and quantity of links". But can't you deep-link to every merchant from content? Some merchants like Buyagift, Prezzybox, Firebox have some awesome tools, but it wouldn't stop me promoting other merchants in the same category that don't have these cool creatives.

And we're "merchant tarts" the most common reason for dropping a merchant is that we've found a better/different merchant to promote instead, followed by changes in commission rates.

I'd find it hard to disagree. What I still find interesting (from personal experience) is that CJ are still the most important network to 10% of affiliates. I'm sure this figure is slightly skewed by which networks promoted the census, but I'd be inclined to run a survey on the A4UForum to get a second opinion.

And the debate about "last click wins" continues. 34% of affiliates agree with the general status quo whilst 18% of affiliates agree with the me that commission should be based on an analysis of contribution - but how? mmmm

Another bit I found interesting was that despite the downturn, more affiliates have moved into the travel sector whilst there's been a big move out of gambling.

Of real interest to me was the data regarding the proportion of B2B affiliates. I manage the Angels Den Affiliate Programme and I'm still shocked to see that only 4% of affiliates operate exclusively in that sector.

And the bit about merchants being loyal to affiliates showed that being honest about why transactions are rejected is a key factor, as well as the de-dupping process. Whilst others argued that merchants shouldn't show loyalty as affiliates aren't loyal in return.

61% of affiliates are content in how they can learn from other affiliates, whilst 39% would like more opportunity. What can us affiliate bloggers do to help?

Also many affiliates were worried about the arrival of large-scale affiliates in the form of established media owners such as the Mirror etc. Whilst one affiliate wrote "Voucher code and incentive-based sites are going to destroy affiliate marketing for normal people and small businesses completely if the systems that are currently allowed for them remain unchecked!" Contentious, but accurate?

Also many affiliates believe that merchants don't often understand affiliate marketing or online marketing in general.

Find out more about the work of Econsultancy.

TwitThis

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

Very Quick SEO Tip - Getting More Of What Works

Now this will only work if you track "goals" in Google Analytics so it'll be mostly relevant for merchants, however, affiliates that have the sort of "click to reveal" redirects can also find this useful.

I know I harp on about how writing loads of fresh content is great for increasing your traffic levels. But we don't always have the time to do that. Sometimes its better just to make more of what you've already got.

Basically, we all know that we get visits that are few and far between but yet convert at very high rates. The idea is that you try and get more of these visits.

There are two reasons why you get traffic in this manner. Either there are actually few searches for those terms (long tail) or you're not ranking as high as others and they're getting the majority of the traffic, whilst some do venture to pages 2,3,4,5 of the SERPS and click on your listing.

So here's how to do it. Go to Google Analytics, and the click get your list of keywords from "non paid" sources (paid will skew things). Then sort by conversion rate for your chosen goal. Export these into a CSV and then open in Notepad or the superb Textpad.

At the top you'll probably have some keywords that give 1 visit but convert at 100% start there and work your way down. For this you'll need two browsers open, I have a multi-screen set up so its easy.

In both browsers you'll have Google open. Pick each keyword and in one of them check your rankings. If you're not on the first page of the SERPS then copy that keyphrase and then do site:www.yoursite.com keyphrase in broadmatch. This will show you the pages that you are most likely to achieve rankings for that keyphrase and then make some recommended changes. At this early stage I'd just focus on looking at your title tags and H1's as you'll probably have a better return on the time spent. If you wanted to be more overt then you can take a note of the PR (or clicks from homepage) and then work out if you'd like to "move" it closer to your homepage or high PR page.

When you're doing this, have another instance of Analytics open and use it to track each page that you're changing and spot which keyphrases are already delivering traffic and make sure your changes don't negate any traffic you're already getting.

Obviously if you're ranked at the top then don't make any changes (unless you spot something obvious). If you're ranked in the bottom half of the page then you'll need to be less overt with your changes.

Work down the list until you've done about 20,30. Your brain will go numb at about 30.

Keep a note of the pages your changing. After a week or two go back into Google Analytics and select "Content" then "Landing pages" then filter on the page urls that you've changed and see if there's been an upward trend in traffic. You can also select to view the "keywords" that have started to send you traffic.

Now you can start to take things to the next level and go through those keywords that you didn't spot before and see where you've ranked and then decide if you want to amend your on-page SEO or create new pages.

Whatever you do, keep a note of what you're changing, what has worked and what hasn't. But I'd certainly look to include active keywords such as "best", "buy", "cheap", "cheapest" etc - but definitely don't stuff things in.

I hope that helps. If you think this "strategy" could be improved, add a comment.

TwitThis

Bookmark and Share

Get Visible - Search Engine Marketing A GET VISIBLE web site designed by McCoy - Freelance Web Design